Skip to main content
· 2/26/1999

Miller v. United States Trustee (In Re Independent Engineering Co.)

Citations

  • 232 B.R. 529
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 265
  • 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 47
  • 1999 WL 247302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the disgorgement of fees because counsel drew against retainers notwithstanding the court’s order requiring him to obtain prior court approval for any compensation
  • \Courts have long recognized that failure to disclose is a sufficient basis for disqualification or disgorgement.\
  • “Courts have long recognized that failure to disclose is a sufficient basis for disqualification or disgorgement.”
  • retainer paid by third party to debtors’ attorney was property of debtors’ estate
  • corporate debtor held property interest in unearned portion of the retainer paid to debtor’s attorney by debtor’s principal, where unearned portion of the retainer would be returned to debtor; retainer was thus property of the estate
  • a “pattern of less than candid disclosure” warranted disgorgement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodman, Haines, Carlo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.