· 2/26/1999
Miller v. United States Trustee (In Re Independent Engineering Co.)
Citations
- 232 B.R. 529
- 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 265
- 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 47
- 1999 WL 247302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the disgorgement of fees because counsel drew against retainers notwithstanding the court’s order requiring him to obtain prior court approval for any compensation
- \Courts have long recognized that failure to disclose is a sufficient basis for disqualification or disgorgement.\
- “Courts have long recognized that failure to disclose is a sufficient basis for disqualification or disgorgement.”
- retainer paid by third party to debtors’ attorney was property of debtors’ estate
- corporate debtor held property interest in unearned portion of the retainer paid to debtor’s attorney by debtor’s principal, where unearned portion of the retainer would be returned to debtor; retainer was thus property of the estate
- a “pattern of less than candid disclosure” warranted disgorgement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodman, Haines, Carlo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.