Miller v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A failure to respond in a timely manner deems the request admitted, and any matter admitted under Rule 36 is conclusively established.” (quotation omitted)
• plaintiff failed to establish causation between protected activity and termination where there was a legitimate intervening basis for the adverse action
• eight-month gap between plaintiffs last complaint and her discharge was not sufficiently proximate to demonstrate that the protected activity was a contributing factor to her termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).