Miller v. State & County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officers and directors of original plaintiff, who were not named as coplaintiffs until subsequent suit, were collaterally estopped from establishing venue because they were in privity with plaintiff in original suit in which venue was finally determined in another county
• holding that officers and directors of original plaintiff, who were not named as coplaintiffs until subsequent suit, were collaterally estopped from establishing venue because they were in privity with plaintiff in original suit in which venue was finally determined in another county
• holding that officers and directors of original plaintiff, who were not named as coplaintiffs until subsequent suit, were collaterally estopped from establishing venue because they were in privity with plaintiff in original suit in which venue was finally determined in another county

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).