Miller v. State
Citations
- 129 Miss. 774
- 93 So. 2
Syllabus
<p>1. Searches and Seizures. Search warrant, not specially designating place to be parched and thing to be seised, when issued, void.</p> <p>A search warrant is void, which does not specially designate the place to be searched and the person or thing to be seized, when issued.</p> <p>2. Criminal Law. Corpus delicti cannot be proven by confession of accused alone. '</p> <p>The corpus delicti must be proven aliunde a confession.</p>
Judges: Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1923-12-17· cited 24×
- In Re Presentment by Camden Co. Grand JurySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1961-03-21· cited 17×
- Cross v. Robert E. Lamb, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1960-02-23· cited 16×
- Butler v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1922-10-15· cited 9×
- Rignall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1923-12-31· cited 8×
- Mayti v. Singer Mfg. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1962-10-01· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics v. CanadaMississippi Supreme Court· 2015-06-04· cited 3×
- Vaughn v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1924-10-13· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.