Miller v. State
Citations
- 105 Miss. 777
- 63 So. 269
Syllabus
<p>1. Sale of Cocaine. Illegal sale. Defenses. Burden of proof. Presumptions.</p> <p>In a prosecution for the unlawful sale of cocaine, it is not incumbent on the state to show that the sale was not made upon a physician’s certificate, but the burden of proof is on the defendant to show that it was so made if he relies upon this as a defense, that fact being peculiarly within his knowledge.</p> <p>2. Illegal Sales. . Qocaine. Defenses. Presumptions.</p> <p>In a prosecution for the unlawful sale of cocaine, there is a double ■ -p'rima facie presumption, first, that the person to whom a sale is made does not belong to the exception class of persons to whom the right to practice medicine or dentistry is given, and second, that as at one time he had no such right he has none -now.</p>
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bryant v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 35×
- Hicks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-12-06· cited 27×
- Estes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2000-10-31· cited 15×
- Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-05-25· cited 8×
- Mark Hicks v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2006-09-27
- Heidelberg v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1973-02-05
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.