Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming an order summarily denying a defendant’s rule 3.850 motion under the “tipsy coachman” doctrine because the trial court properly denied relief, though not for the correct reason
• affirming an order summarily denying a defendant’s rule 3.850 motion under the “tipsy coachman” doctrine because the trial court properly denied relief, though not for the correct reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Masis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-18· cited 2×
• Christopher Boatwright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-03
• KEITH ERIC CHRISTIAN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-05-04
• Munsey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-09

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Heggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 853×
• Coppola v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-28· cited 19×