District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/16/1981
Miller v. State
Citations
- 403 So. 2d 619
- 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defense counsel's objection to use by the state of a witness not listed in discovery was sufficient to necessitate a Richardson hearing, distinguishing Lucas v. State, 376 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1979
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cobb, Sharp, Upchurch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- Zeigler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-11· cited 111×
- Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-06-14· cited 104×
- Cumbie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-03-17· cited 82×
- Wilcox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-02-08· cited 45×
- Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-07-18· cited 38×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-07-24· cited 14×
- Hardison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-01-05· cited 11×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-25· cited 10×
- McDonnough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-07-29· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.