Skip to main content

Miller v. State

Citations

  • 362 S.W.3d 264
  • 2010 Ark. 1
  • 2010 WL 129708
  • 2010 Ark. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the components of harmless-error analysis applicable to an evidentiary ruling in the guilt phase of a capital-murder trial are whether there is overwhelming evidence of guilt and the error is slight
  • recognizing that the components of harmless-error analysis applicable to an evidentiary ruling in the guilt phase of a capital-murder trial are whether there is overwhelming evidence of guilt and the error is slight
  • concluding that no requirement “that all jurors be brought in for voir dire and not be excluded based on . . . their beliefs about the death penalty . . . . exists under either state or federal law”
  • ”[A]lthough there was no consensus among the expert opinions as to exactly what Miller’s intelligence quotient was, all experts agreed that it was above 65.”
  • reviewing a range of evidence other than IQ scores

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donald L. Corbin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.