Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exposure does not require “exposed to sight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-10· cited 23×
• Balfour v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-04-29· cited 23×
• Beasley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1995-10-03· cited 16×
• Mauro v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-04-18· cited 8×
• Hearn v. Short
  S.D. Texas· 1971-04-16· cited 4×
• Roger Maurice Bonds v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-03-23
• William Balfour v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-04-29
• Donald Paul Mauro v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2007-04-18
• Larry Joe McNeal v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-09-02
• Tanavionne Marcell Robertson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2017-02-01
• Waylon Sparkman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2017-04-28
• Julian Gutierrez Moncada v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2020-10-22
• Tommy Doyle Chambliss v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2023-03-09