Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the late-filing of a motion for new trial is “jurisdictional and not merely procedural,” such that the trial court had no discretion to relieve the criminal defendant of the associated deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Murray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-11-01· cited 18×
• 14302 Marina San Pablo Place SPE, LLC v. VCP-San Pablo, Ltd.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-27· cited 14×
• Feldman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-07-02· cited 10×
• State v. Farmer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-11· cited 8×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-07-19· cited 4×
• Perez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-07-24· cited 3×
• Dames v. Dames
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-10-08· cited 3×
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-05-24· cited 2×
• Cole v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-06-03
• Dix v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-11-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1960-06-08· cited 54×
• State Ex Rel. Diamond Berk Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Carroll
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-04-18· cited 36×
• Farrior v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1954-11-16· cited 14×
• Long v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-09-11· cited 6×