Miller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prejudice prong not satisfied where omission of hearsay statement would not have resulted in the jury believing that appellant was innocent
• “[A] victim’s prior inconsistent statements are admissible as substantive evidence for the jury’s consideration. Thus, a jury is authorized to believe the victim’s pre-trial statements rather than her in-court disavowal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cannon v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-09-20· cited 16×
• Galvan v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-02-05· cited 15×
• Pierre v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-03-03· cited 5×
• LONON v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-02-07
• Russell Calvin McCurdy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Miller v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2009-04-28· cited 131×
• Andrews v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-09-08· cited 9×
• Lopez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-04-23· cited 7×
• Miller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-05-02· cited 3×