· 10/26/1926
Miller v. Snook
Citations
- 15 F.2d 68
- 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Attacking only one piece of evidence among a wide variety of cumulative evidence presented in a jury trial does not provide a reasonable basis for reversal.”
- “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
- “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
- “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
- “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
- sanctions imposed because the appeal was frivolous as filed and as argued
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sibley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.