Skip to main content
· 10/26/1926

Miller v. Snook

Citations

  • 15 F.2d 68
  • 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Attacking only one piece of evidence among a wide variety of cumulative evidence presented in a jury trial does not provide a reasonable basis for reversal.”
  • “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
  • “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
  • “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
  • “The correction of an error must yield a different result in order for that error to have been harmful and thus prejudice a substantial right of a party.”
  • sanctions imposed because the appeal was frivolous as filed and as argued

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sibley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.