Miller v. Schafer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• party who permits improper evidence to be admitted at trial cannot claim reversible error on appeal
• “[I]t would seem to be clear that [the existence of workers’ compensation coverage] is irrelevant and that it is improper to introduce it with no apparent purpose other than to influence the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).