Miller v. Sattler Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “To recover in tort against defendants . . . plaintiffs must prove the employer (1) consciously desired the physical result of its act, whatever the likelihood of that result happening from its conduct, or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sibert v. National Oil Well Varco, L.P.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-02-26· cited 12×
• Gardner v. Craft
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-03-05· cited 7×
• Stanley v. Airgas-Southwest, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2015-04-24· cited 7×
• Higgins v. Williams Energy Partner, L.P.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-12-12· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reeves v. Structural Preservation Systems
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1999-03-12· cited 161×
• Jasmin v. HNV Cent. Riverfront Corp.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1994-08-30· cited 57×
• Armstead v. Schwegmann Giant Super Markets, Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-04-28· cited 48×
• Tapia v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-11-26· cited 42×
• Simoneaux v. Excel Group, LLC
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2006-09-01· cited 13×
• Moreau v. Moreau's Material Yard, LLC
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2012-09-21· cited 5×

Other cases named Miller v. Sattler Supply Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Miller v. Sattler Supply Co.
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2012-06-22