Skip to main content
· 7/22/2009

Miller v. Sallie Mae, Inc. (In Re Miller)

Citations

  • 409 B.R. 299
  • 2009 WL 2196760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that it was “entirely appropriate” for purposes of Brunner to consider the income of debtor’s spouse since spouse had “a legal duty to provide for her support.” (citations omitted)
  • “As stated, the heart of Sallie Mae’s argument concerning the Debtor’s Home is that the Debtor has not offered evidence to establish (or at least create a disputed issue of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eric L. Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.