Miller v. ROSENKER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply equitable tolling because the pro se plaintiff “failed to meet his burden to c[o]me forward with any evidence showing [an appropriate situation for the application of equitable tolling]”
• declining to apply equitable tolling where pro se plaintiff noted that his filing was ready to be mailed on the applicable date, but the post office had already closed when he went
• declining to apply equitable tolling where pro se plaintiff noted that his filing was ready to be mailed on the applicable date, but the post office had already closed when he went
• decline to apply equitable tolling where “Plaintiff has failed to meet his burden to c[o]me forward with any evidence showing that the delay in filing the administrative appeal was anything more than the result of neglect and lack of due diligence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).