Miller v. Richert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts should “review the evidence known to [the defendants] with an eye to whether any reasonable officer would have sought arrest . . . warrants based on that information”
• “The children’s initial denial that any [sexual] abuse occurred is not unusual, nor is the fact that the physical evidence was not dramatic. Thus, the children’s early reticence does not militate against a conclusion that the state officials acted with probable cause.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).