Skip to main content
· 6/4/2012

Miller v. Poole

Citations

  • 45 A.3d 1143
  • 2012 Pa. Super. 116
  • 2012 WL 1980647
  • 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parol evidence is admissible only where an ambiguity is present and extrinsic proof if necessary to clarify or resolve the ambiguity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Allen, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.