· 6/4/2012
Miller v. Poole
Citations
- 45 A.3d 1143
- 2012 Pa. Super. 116
- 2012 WL 1980647
- 2012 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- parol evidence is admissible only where an ambiguity is present and extrinsic proof if necessary to clarify or resolve the ambiguity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elliott, Allen, Strassburger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.