Miller v. Pettit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contrasting Mary M., 54 Cal. 3d at 207, with Lisa 20 M., 12 Cal. 4th at 306
• applying Ohio law and noting that contract was not ambiguous because the issue between the parties was not “covered by the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).