Miller v. Parvin
Citations
- 111 Kan. 444
- 207 P. 826
- 1922 Kan. LEXIS 273
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Trespassing Cattle — Findings• — ■Fences—Value of Property Destroyed. Testimony examined and held sufficient to sustain the finding as to the sufficiency of the fence, the value of the cane destroyed and the judgment rendered.</p> <p>2. Same — Herd-lato Counties — Liability of Owners of Cattle. In herd-law counties the liability of the owner of live stock for trespass committed by his cattle upon the crops of an adjoining landowner is the same as at common law, such owner being bound at his peril to keep his cattle from committing such trespass.</p>
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.