Skip to main content
· 5/17/2002

Miller v. Pacific Shore Funding

Citations

  • 224 F. Supp. 2d 977
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9611
  • 2002 WL 1012014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the defense of limitations may be raised in a motion to dismiss, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)
  • stating that, “[w]hen it appears on the face of the complaint that the limitation period has run, a defendant may properly assert a limitations defense through a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss”
  • “In a multi-defendant action or class action, the named plaintiffs must establish that they have been harmed by each of the defendants.”
  • “When the bare allegations of the complaint conflict with any exhibits or documents, whether attached or adopted by reference, the exhibits or documents prevail”
  • “When the bare allegations of the complaint conflict with any exhibits or documents, whether attached or adopted by reference, the exhibits or documents prevail”
  • “When the bare allegations of the complaint conflict with any exhibits or documents, whether attached or adopted by reference, the exhibits or documents prevail”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smalkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.