Miller v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• uncorrobo rated inconsistent identification statement had indicia of reliability, was alone sufficient to support parole revocation
• prior inconsistent statement of witness was substantive evidence at parole revocation hearing which the Parole Board could reasonably credit over witness's in-person testimony at the Parole Board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).