Miller v. Northwest Region Library Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process claim, holding that access to public library computers was a protected liberty interest
• rejecting a defendant’s argument that “there is no such entity” when the defendant “clearly had notice of this action and should have known that the action was brought against [it]”
• rejecting a defendant’s argument that “there is no such entity” when the defendant “clearly had notice of this action and should have known that the action was brought against [it]”
• denying motion to compel as moot because the documents requested had already been provided
• “In addition, pro se litigants are allowed even greater latitude to correct defects in service of process and pleadings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).