· 5/2/2002
Miller v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co.
Citations
- 208 F. Supp. 2d 851
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12356
- 2002 WL 1461783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “counsel who in the future file unfounded, unmerited, and unsuccessful motions for reconsideration simply because they disagree with a ruling, decision, or order should expect to be to be sanctioned to the full extent permitted under Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.