Skip to main content
· 5/2/2002

Miller v. Norfolk Southern Rwy. Co.

Citations

  • 208 F. Supp. 2d 851
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12356
  • 2002 WL 1461783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “counsel who in the future file unfounded, unmerited, and unsuccessful motions for reconsideration simply because they disagree with a ruling, decision, or order should expect to be to be sanctioned to the full extent permitted under Rule 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.