Miller v. NATIONAL ASS'N OF SECURITIES DEALERS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that plaintiff was assigned more demanding tasks than similarly situated younger employees gave rise to an inference of age discrimination
• finding that plaintiff had not established an inference of discrimination where he was fired over two years before his eligibility for early retirement and collecting cases
• finding that plaintiff had not established an inference of discrimination where he was fired over two years before his eligibility for early retirement and collecting cases
• plaintiffs nearly two decades of working for defendant evidenced a prima facie case of qualification
• “The relevant inquiry is not whether the performance-based justification for plaintiff’s termination articulated by defendant is accurate or fair, but whether plaintiff can show any evidence that it was not the actual justification.”
• “The relevant inquiry is not whether the performance-based justification for plaintiff’s termination articulated by defendant is accurate or fair, but whether plaintiff can show any evidence that it was not the actual justification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).