Miller v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is a strong presumption that placing separate property into a joint account demonstrates an intent to treat the property as marital.”
• “Inherited property is separate, even if received during marriage, though it can be transmuted into marital property where that is the intent of the owner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beals v. Beals
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-06-28· cited 81×
• Odom v. Odom
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-08-11· cited 54×
• Barnett v. Barnett
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2010-08-27· cited 52×
• Day v. Williams
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-09-07· cited 28×
• Abood v. Abood
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2005-09-02· cited 25×
• Heustess v. Kelley-Heustess
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-05-25· cited 17×
• Brennan v. Brennan
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2018-08-10· cited 17×
• Pierce v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2011-07-29· cited 15×
• Meister v. Meister
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-12-02· cited 15×
• Lydia May f/k/a Lydia Petersen v. Jon-Marc Petersen
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2025-03-14· cited 1×
• John L. Philips v. Barbara S. Bremner Philips, Barbara S. Bremner-Philips v. John L. Philips
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 1×
• Julie Ann Kilkenny v. Steve James Kilkenny
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2025-09-19
• Jacob A. Marquez v. Dawn L. Marquez, Dawn L. Marquez v. Jacob A. Marquez
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2026-04-10