Miller v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the independent resources of a college age child may be considered in determining the child's need for support
• the independent resources of a college age child may be considered in determining the child’s need for support
• trial court erred by failing to consider student’s “potential contribution ... in light of his parents’ financial circumstances”
• trial court erred by failing to consider student's \potential contribution . . . in light of his parents' financial circumstances\
• the independent resources of a college age child may be considered in determining the child's need for support
• the independent resources of a college age child may be considered in determining the child’s need for support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blue v. Blue
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-13· cited 86×
• Griffin v. Griffin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-29· cited 49×
• Bedford v. Bedford
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-03· cited 28×
• Leonard v. Leonard Ex Rel. Leonard
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-20· cited 28×
• Pharoah v. Lapes
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-01· cited 19×
• Spitzer v. Tucker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-05-21· cited 18×
• Chesonis v. Chesonis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-23· cited 16×
• McGettigan v. McGettigan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-08· cited 11×
• Rich v. Rich
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-01-15· cited 10×
• Holcomb v. Holcomb
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-31· cited 8×
• Diehl on Behalf of Beaver v. Beaver
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-10· cited 7×
• Scott v. Scott
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-05-24· cited 1×