Skip to main content
· 9/14/2011

Miller v. McHugh

Citations

  • 814 F. Supp. 2d 299
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103956
  • 2011 WL 4091466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting plaintiff’s summary judgment motion as to a violation of section 1692e(2)(A) and dismissing plaintiff’s remaining claims as moot
  • “Defendant K & B is a law firm that primarily represents landlords in New York City. K & B is a debt collector as defined by the FDCPA.”
  • not intentional violation where no evidence that the defendant “knowingly misrepresent[ed] [the plaintiff's] debt”
  • “Proof of one violation is sufficient to support recovery under the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.