Miller v. Louisville Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that in the ADA retaliation context, “[e]mployer knowledge of an EEOC charge is ‘absolutely necessary’ for a finding of retaliation” (quoting Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty, 145 F.3d 653, 657 (4th Cir. 1998))
• finding that in the Title VII context, “[e]mployer knowledge of an EEOC charge is ‘absolutely necessary’ for a finding of retaliation” (citing Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty, 145 F.3d 653, 657 (4th Cir. 1998))
• finding that in the Title VII context, “[e]mployer knowledge of an EEOC charge is ‘absolutely necessary’ for a finding of retaliation” (quoting Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty, 145 F.3d 653, 657 (4th Cir. 1988))
• finding seven months to be too long to establish a causal relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).