Miller v. Loman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that factors will “have greater or lesser weight depending upon the circumstances of each individual case”
• rejecting a test focusing only on distance and time when considering whether an individual was “alighting” from a vehicle and noting that “other relevant criteria” may be considered
• finding connection between passenger kicking a truck’s muffler out of the road and the “use” or “maintenance” of the truck was “too unsubstantial” and “simply too farfetched” to qualify for coverage
• \Any connection between Miller's injuries and eventual maintenance of the truck is simply too farfetched to bring him within the policy.\
• “We believe the proper determine of whether an individual is ‘alighting from’ or ‘getting out’ of an automobile requires the examination of several factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).