Miller v. Lelen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the New Delhi High Court had concluded 5 that “the seat of arbitration” determined the forum in which to initiate a set-aside 6 petition
• faulting the Indian government for failing to cite authority 13 “indicating that Indian courts have broader discretion when deciding whether to enforce 14 arbitral awards,” but “tak[ing] India’s word”
• “[G]iven the length of 16 time [petitioner] has waited to receive the award, and the amount of money at issue, 17 [petitioner] would be burdened should the [c]ourt delay confirmation of the award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).