Miller v. Leighty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing trial court’s entry of permanent stalking protective order because the trial court did not “afford [] respondent an opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses, including petitioner, [or] to present his own evidence”
• even if the respondent violated temporary SPO, respondent was entitled to full trial to determine whether a permanent SPO should issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).