Miller v. Lay Trucking Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff's common law action for fraudulent inducement was not preempted by ERISA because the fraud occurred prior to the time the plaintiff entered the plan, and because the fraud claim did not directly affect the regulation of the ERISA plan
• holding that the plaintiff's common law action for fraudulent inducement was not preempted by ERISA because the fraud occurred prior to the time the plaintiff entered the plan, and because the fraud claim did not directly affect the regulation of the ERISA plan
• declining to preempt when fraud occurred before plan was created and only indirectly affected plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).