Miller v. Lake Irrigation Co.

Citations

• 33 Wash. 132
• 74 P. 61
• 1903 Wash. LEXIS 498

Syllabus

<p>Law of the Case—Objections Conflicting with Decision on Former Appeal. Objection to the establishment of priorities of right in the use of water in a stream and to injunctive relief, under the pleadings, cannot be made after the supreme court on a former appeal has established as the law of the case that such question is the vital question, and remanded the cause for the purpose of determining the same and perpetully enjoining interference therewith.</p> <p>Irrigation—Priorities—Sufficiency of Evidence. Findings and conclusions establishing the priority of appropriations of water for irrigation not disturbed.</p> <p>Findings—Number of. The number of findings is immaterial where they are not conflicting and are within the pleadings and jurisdiction of the'court.</p>