Skip to main content

Miller v. Johnson

Citations

  • 436 A.2d 1187
  • 496 Pa. 290
  • 1981 Pa. LEXIS 1058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where certain things are specifically designated in a statute, all omissions should be understood as exclusions
  • where certain things are specifically designated in a statute, all omissions should be understood as exclusions
  • chiropractic services included within \medical services\ where legislative act reflected intent to include \not only direct but also supplemental support services.\
  • where certain things are specifically designated in a statute, all omissions should be understood as exclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Kauffman, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.