Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (In Re Miller)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the jury’s finding that the defendant wrongfully appropriated property did not include a finding of fraudulent intent
• holding that a finding of misappropriation, without the requisite mental state, is insufficient to satisfy § 523(a)(4)
• concluding that where an injury is intentional, is can not be justified or excused
• noting that \[t]he Supreme Court's disposition in Kawaauhau certainly eliminates the possibility that 'willful' encompasses negligence or recklessness\
• noting that “[t]he Supreme Court’s disposition in Kawaauhau certainly eliminates the possibility that ‘willful’ encompasses negligence or recklessness”
• noting that, “[m]erely because a tort is classified as intentional does not mean that any injury caused by the tortfeasor is willful.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).