Miller v. Imperial Insurance Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court properly decided consent as question of fact, rather than of law, when evidence rebutting defense, although not expressly contradicted, was “not convincing” and thus was insufficient to overcome presumption of consent
• trial court properly decided consent as question of fact, rather than of law, when evidence rebutting defense, although not expressly contradicted, was \not convincing\ and thus was insufficient to overcome presumption of consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).