Miller v. IBM

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to address defendant’s arguments that that exclusive way to challenge agency rule is “declaratory judgment under 3 V.S.A. § 807”
• attorney fee cap was “reasonably related to the purpose of avoiding ‘unnecessary expense in the enforcement or defense’ of claims”
• attorney fee cap was \reasonably related to the purpose of avoiding `unnecessary expense in the enforcement or defense' of claims\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).