Miller v. Ibarra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Congress did not intend to discourage this type of transaction and relying, in part, on the trusts’ remainder provisions
• discussing various state court rulings on the availability of trust funds in determining medical eligibility
• declaring trust assets unavailable because the trustee lacked discretion, under all circumstances, to distribute more than a specific dollar amount
• court’s holding premised on unfairness of Colorado’s “Utah Gap” rule and motivations for the creation of trust
• “Under the terms of the trusts at issue, assuming full exercise of discretion by the trustees, they cannot distribute more than an amount $20.00 less than the Medicaid income eligibility level.”
• trust created by courts for incompetent person pursuant to State statute not self-settled

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).