District of Columbia· 10/31/2006
Miller v. Holzmann
Citations
- 240 F.R.D. 1
- 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 977
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78894
- 2006 WL 3082359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining based on context and facts of case that interrogatory was not vague
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Facciola
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2022-09-16· cited 4×
- Rendon Group, Inc. v. RigsbyD. Massachusetts· 2010-06-16· cited 2×
- McNamara v. PickenDistrict of Columbia· 2013-06-04
- The Rendon Group, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia· 2010-06-17
- Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. CafesjianDistrict of Columbia· 2009-02-19
- Jefferson v. AustinDistrict of Columbia· 2024-02-08
- Glock, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of International Trade· 2024-10-04
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pleasants v. AllbaughDistrict of Columbia· 2002-05-22· cited 44×
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict of Columbia· 2004-05-03· cited 39×
- Disability Rights Council of Greater Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2006-03-04· cited 34×
- Willingham v. AshcroftDistrict of Columbia· 2005-01-25· cited 16×
- Sigmund v. Starwood Urban Retail VI, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2006-06-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.