Skip to main content

Miller v. Hennen

Citations

  • 438 N.W.2d 366
  • 1989 Minn. LEXIS 90
  • 1989 WL 34299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that once a party has actual notice “that someone other than the 'vendor was living on the land,” it had “a duty to inquire concerning the rights of the inhabitant of the property”
  • stating that adverse claims to property are subject to equitable relief
  • holding the purchaser’s investigation of the recorded mortgage, which consisted of visiting the property, searching the tract index for other instruments, and contacting the record owner, to be a reasonable off-record search of the title to the property
  • “A recorded interest is constructive notice only of the facts appearing on the face of the record.” (quotation omitted)
  • “The burden is on the party resisting the prior unrecorded title to prove that he purchased or acquired such title in good faith.”
  • the supreme court noted that equity favored the purchaser who took steps to inquire into title over plaintiff who failed to protect its interests

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Miller v. Hennen

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.