Miller v. Griesel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that school authorities must exercise reasonable care and supervision for the safety of the children under their control
• holding that where sovereign immunity defense was not raised at trial court level, it was improper for consideration on appeal
• holding that \the common law of [Indiana] recognizes a duty on the part of school personnel to exercise ordinary and reasonable care for the safety of the children under this authority\
• holding that “the common law of [Indiana] recognizes a duty on the part of school personnel to exercise ordinary and reasonable care for the safety of the children under this authority”
• stating that there is a duty recognized at law for school authorities to exercise reasonable care for the safety of their children
• finding that \the relationship of school pupils and school authorities should call into play the well recognized duty in tort law that persons entrusted with children ... have a special responsibility recognized by the common law to supervise their charges\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).