Miller v. Gorman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that whether disfigurement is permanent or temporary is purely a question of fact
• referee could not properly take judicial notice of the permanence of an eye injury resulting in closing of right eyelid and squinting
• referee could not properly take judicial notice of the permanence of an eye injury resulting in closing of right eyelid and squinting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).