Miller v. Fed. Election Comm'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \expert testimony is essential to a claim based on the prudent manufacturer test\ and affirming a grant of summary judgment where the district court had properly excluded expert testimony proffered by an injured plaintiff
• excluding expert opinion in part because it was based on erroneous assumption regarding underlying facts
• excluding expert opinion in part because it was based on erroneous assumption regarding underlying facts
• “[E]xpert testimony about the prudence of the decision to market would be essential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).