Miller v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff's claim based on the employer-employee relationship is not covered by the SCUTPA
• declining to extend the exception to situations where the employee was terminated for refusal to act in- a manner that would result in civil sanctions
• declining to extend the exception where an employee was terminated for refusal to act in a manner that could result in civil sanctions
• explaining the SCUTPA is inapplicable to matters involving employer-employee relations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).