Skip to main content
· 5/13/2009

Miller v. EQUIFAX, INC.

Citations

  • 208 P.3d 498
  • 228 Or. App. 324
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a state trial court was without jurisdiction to consider an amended complaint filed in a previously removed action when the federal court had dismissed, instead of remanded, the action and that, in that scenario, the plaintiff was required to refile the action as a new case
  • the plaintiffs filed a complaint, in state court, against Equifax; after Equifax removed the case to federal court, the district court (per the parties’ stipulation
  • the plaintiffs filed a complaint, in state court, against Equifax; after Equifax removed the case to federal court, the district court (per the parties’ stipulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.