· 5/13/2009
Miller v. EQUIFAX, INC.
Citations
- 208 P.3d 498
- 228 Or. App. 324
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 459
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a state trial court was without jurisdiction to consider an amended complaint filed in a previously removed action when the federal court had dismissed, instead of remanded, the action and that, in that scenario, the plaintiff was required to refile the action as a new case
- the plaintiffs filed a complaint, in state court, against Equifax; after Equifax removed the case to federal court, the district court (per the parties’ stipulation
- the plaintiffs filed a complaint, in state court, against Equifax; after Equifax removed the case to federal court, the district court (per the parties’ stipulation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.