Skip to main content
· 12/30/2009

Miller v. Eisentrager

Citations

  • 779 N.W.2d 79
  • 2009 WL 5126118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding an agent could not rebut the presumption of undue influence when she admitted using the principal’s funds for her and her family’s benefit, although still providing him care, and almost completely depleted the principal’s estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.