Miller v. Edward Jones & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment on hostile work environment claim due to disputed issues of material fact
• United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cautioned district courts that direct evidence of intent rarely found
• “[C]omplaints that are vague and ambiguous and do not sufficiently articulate the nature of the harassment do not constitute a protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).