· 3/24/2005
Miller v. Dretke
Citations
- 404 F.3d 908
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4820
- 2005 WL 675327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying COA in capital murder case regarding suppression of evidence that defendant had not shot the victim because “uncontroverted, overwhelming evidence” showed that defendant participated in the crime and was, thus, guilty under Texas’s law of the parties
- “Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the district court must first decide whether to grant a COA request before one can be requested here.”
- “Under [Rule] 22(b)(1), the district court must first decide whether to grant a COA request before one can be requested here.” (emphasis added)
- “Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the district court must first decide whether to grant a COA request before one can be requested here.”
- “Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)(1), the district court must first decide whether to grant a COA request before one can be requested here.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barksdale, Garza, Dennis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.