Miller v. Diversified Loan Service Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “It is generally held that if the financial institution exercises control over the creditors by ... determining the amount of the credit extended and its terms, such interconnectedness precludes the financing company from becoming a holder in due course.”
• “W.Va.Code, 46-3-401(1), expressly provides that ‘[n]o person is liable on an instrument unless his signature appears thereon.’ If, therefore, the Millers successfully prove that their signatures are not authentic, neither the note nor the trust deed may be enforced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).